Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications

Table 2 A comparison among the prediction performance of model trained on different splitting

From: The performance of consumer-grade near infrared spectrometer in traditional Chinese medicine

Training data	mRMSECV	Test data	RMSEP	RPD
AVG	0.3601	AVG	0.3076	6.83
AVG	–	RAW	0.4920	4.17
RAW	0.5764	RAW	0.4171	4.92
RAW	–	AVG	0.3252	6.46
RAW¹	0.5314	RAW	0.4484	4.58

¹Sample splitting was performed on the raw data

Back to article page