 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Optical image encryption using gamma distribution phase masks in the gyrator domain
Journal of the European Optical SocietyRapid Publicationsvolume 14, Article number: 28 (2018)
Abstract
Background
Optical information encryption technology has received extensive attention from researchers in recent years because of its advantages of parallel and highspeed processing capability, as well as the controllability of phase components.
Methods
An encryption method for grayscale images with a pair of random phase masks based on gamma distribution in the gyrator domain is proposed. In this scheme, two random distribution phaseimages using random parameters according to the definition of the gamma probability distribution function are generated. They are loaded onto spatial light modulators as random phase masks used in the encryption process. The input grayscale image transmitted through the first random phase mask. And then they are encoded by the first gyrator transform. The resulting information is again encrypted by a second gamma distribution random phase mask at the gyrator frequency plane. The final results are encoded by the second gyrator transform.
Results
Numerical simulations are presented to confirm the security, validity, and flexibility of the proposed idea. The gyrator transform rotation angle sensitivity test is also simulated. The occlusion and noise attacks analysis establish the scheme’s robustness.
Conclusions
In gyrator transformbased optical image encryption cipher system, encrypting the input image with different parameters of gamma distribution RPMs will significantly change the statistical distribution of phase in the ciphertext. It means that the phase distribution in the ciphertext will not obey the law of random scattering medium. Therefore, it has potential to resist the attack based on the phase retrieval algorithm. Therefore, the security and flexibility of encryption can be improved by using gamma distribution RPMs.
Introduction
Optical information encryption technology has received extensive attention from researchers in recent years because of its advantages of parallel and highspeed processing capability, as well as the controllability of phase components. One of the earliest and most widely studied optical encryption method for image encryption was the double random phase encoding (DRPE) system which was proposed by Refregier and Javidi [1,2,3,4,5]. This architecture is based on a 4f imaging system and together with a pair of independent random phase keys (PRKs), which one in the input plane and another in the Fourier plane for encryption amplitude image. After more than 20 years of development, the family of optical information encryption systems has been greatly expanded. They provide many degrees of freedom with which optical beam may be encoded, including amplitude, phase, wavelength, and polarization. Now, there are still many examples showing that optical security and encoding techniques have continued to attract the attention of researchers [6,7,8].
A number of optical encryption methods have been proposed, based on the conventional DRPE configuration, to further enlarge the key space of the encryption system by extending it to the fractional Fourier transform (FrFT) domain [9,10,11], Hartley transform domain [12, 13], Fresnel domain [14,15,16] and wavelet domain [17, 18] et al. The gyrator transform (GT) belongs to the linear canonical integral transform and corresponds to the rotations in the twisted positionspatial frequency planes of phase space [19, 20]. This scheme is flexible and easy to implement through an optoelectronic system. Therefore, many improved solutions have been proposed for color image [21,22,23,24,25], multiple images [26,27,28,29,30], and watermarking [31], etc.
For security enhancement, another alternative is to use structured phase key (SPK) in the encryptiondecryption process instead of whitenoised RPK. Several kinds of SPK have been constructed, such as fractal zone mask [32], linear phase mask [33], toroidal zone mask [34,35,36], spiral phase mask [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44], etc. All these SPKs have shown significant simplicity and robustness to meet the requirements of high flexibility and safety. They have been applied to different domains mentioned above.
In this paper, an image encryption and decryption based on DRPE and gamma distribution phase masks in GT domain is introduced. In this scheme, two random distribution phaseimages are generated using random parameters according to the definition of the gamma probability distribution function. They are loaded onto spatial light modulators (SLMs) as RPKs used in encryption process. A grayscale image is encrypted with a first RPK placed at the input plane and then performed the first GT. The resulting spectrum is again encrypted into second RPK placed at the GT spectrum plane and then executed the second GT. The construction parameters of RPKs and rotation angles of GT are introduced for encryption. Therefore, the security and flexibility of the DRPE system are enhanced.
The paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we present a brief mathematical description of GT, gamma distribution, and the encryption scheme. In Section 3, we present the results based on computer simulations for validation and evaluation of the scheme’s performance. Finally, the conclusions of the study are summarized in Section 4.
Methods
Gyrator transform
The GT is a linear canonical integral transform and similar to the FrFT. It produces rotation in the twisted position spatial frequency planes. For a twodimensional function f(x, y), the GT with rotation angle ξ is written as
where the kernel is defined as
Here, (u, v) and (u, v) are the coordinates on the input and output plane. G(u, v) is the output of the GT. GT has the following special properties: The properties of the GT are summarized as follows: (1) When ξ = 0, it corresponds to the identity transform. (2) For ξ = ± π/2, the GT reduces to a FT/inverse FT with a rotation of the coordinates at π/2. (3) The inverse transform of G^{ξ} is expressed as G^{−ξ} or G^{2π − ξ}. (4) The GT is periodic with 2π and additive with respect to rotation angle, \( {G}^{\xi_1}{G}^{\xi_2}={G}^{\xi_1+{\xi}_2} \). The GT can be implemented by an optimized flexible optical system having planoconvex cylindrical lenses with a fixed distance between them. The angle ξ is changed by proper rotation of two lenses. The digital GT can be implemented with twodimensional discrete fast Fourier transform.
Gamma distribution
In probability theory and statistics, the gamma distribution is a twoparameter family of continuous probability distributions. The exponential distribution, Erlang distribution, and chisquared distribution are special cases of the gamma distribution with different parameters [45]. A random variable X that is gamma distribution with shape parameter α and rate parameter β is denoted
The corresponding probability density function (PDF) in the shaperate parameterization is
where X > 0, α, β > 0 and Γ(α) is the upper incomplete gamma function. The upper incomplete gamma function is defined as
The formula for the gamma cumulative probability function (CDF) is
where γ(α, βX) is the lower incomplete gamma function which is defined as
If X is Γ(α, β) random variable and the shape parameter α is large relative to the scale parameter 1/β, then X approximately has a normal random variable with mean μ = α/β and variance σ^{2} = α/β^{2}. Figure 1 is the plot of the gamma PDF for different pairs of parameters (α, β). We also define a linear function to map the value of a random variable to the corresponding interval, as follows
where a is referred to as the slope of the line, and b as the intercept.
Encryption setup
An optoelectronic hybrid setup of the proposed method is depicted in Fig. 2. In this scheme, the GT optical setup is constructed by using three generalized lenses with fixed distances between them. The left dotted block consists of lenses L_{1}, L_{2} and L_{1} denotes the first optical GT and the right one consists of lenses \( {L}_1^{\prime } \), \( {L}_2^{\prime } \) and \( {L}_1^{\prime } \) represents the second optical GT. The spatial distribution of pixel value of the original image is changed digitally by the first discrete Fourier transform (DFT), attached to a gamma distribution random phase mask (RPM1), displayed on the first SLM in the input plane, and then optically transformed by the first GT. The spatial distribution of pixel value of the transformed image is changed digitally by the second DFT, attached to another gamma distribution RPM2, displayed on the second SLM in GT plane, and then optically transformed by the second GT. The encrypted complex amplitude is superimposed on the plane reference beam to produce a holographic interference fringe, which is captured and recorded as an offaxis hologram by charged couple device (CCD) camera, and digitally processed by a computer system. The encrypted complex amplitude function can be expressed as
where φ_{1}(x, y) and φ_{2}(x, y) are the phase functions with gamma probability distribution. ξ_{1} and ξ_{2} are rotation angles for the first and second GT. The decryption system has the same structure as the encryption system but uses a conjugated RPM. For real number input, the decrypted image is obtained by a reverse of the encryption process with GT at the rotation −ξ_{1}, −ξ_{2} and conjugation of the second RPM. In this scheme, the alignment accuracy is limited by the pixel size of 20μm and thus a large spacebandwidth product is obtained [21].
Results and discussion
Numerical simulations have been performed on a Matlab R2016a. A pepper image having 512 × 512 pixels and 8bits gray levels is regarded as an original image as shown in Fig. 3.
In the first case, the gamma distribution parameters are α = 2 and β = 1 for RPM1 and RPM2. In order to limit most of the phase values within the required range, according to Eq. (8), the linear transformation parameters are set to (a, b) = (1, 1) for RPM1 and (a, b) = (2, 0) for RPM2. The amplitude part and phase part of the encrypted result with these parameters are displayed in Fig. 4a, b, respectively. The corresponding histograms are shown in Fig. 4c, d. The patterns of the RPMs are displayed in Fig. 4e, f. The transformation angle of the first and second GTs are both π/4. The decrypted image with all correct keys is illustrated in Fig. 4g. For comparison, a second case is induced. A pair of uniform distribution RPMs were employed to the pepper image in GT encryption system. In this scenario, the rotation angles of GTs are ξ_{1} = ξ_{2} = π/4. The corresponding encryption results, histograms and phase key distributions are shown in Fig. 5ag. According to the results of hypothesis testing, under the case of a 95% confidence level, the encrypted amplitude images of both uniform and gamma distribution RPM schemes obey the Rayleigh distribution which are depicted in Figs. 4c and 5c. However, the probability distributions of encrypted phase images are significant different between two schemes. In the uniform RPM scheme, phase probability distribution obeys uniform distribution. In this case, it obeys the phase distribution model of random scattering medium. However, in the gamma RPM scheme, phase probability distribution does not follow uniform distribution, Gaussian distribution or Rayleigh distribution, according to the results of hypothesis testing. And output phase distribution depends on the parameter selection of gamma PDF. In fact, the proposed method is a more general way of configuring RPMs. The introduction of random distribution parameters and linear functions makes this method more flexible. On the other hand, it means that the phase distribution in the ciphertext has broken the scattering law of the random medium. It has potential to obstruct phase retrieval algorithm which is based on the hypothesis of uniform distribution of phase in the ciphertext.
To evaluate the performance of the proposed method quantitatively, there are several statistical indicators are introduced. The mean square error (MSE) and the peak signaltonoise ratio (PSNR) are defined as
where I_{o}(x, y) and I(x, y) are original and encrypted/decrypted image respectively. M × N represents the pixels size of the image and R = 255 is the maximum fluctuation in the input data type. The value of MSE represents the difference between input and output images at the aspect of pixel data. The quality of the decrypted result is also addressed by illustrating a retrieved image in order to assist the MSE function in vision. The decrypted result with all correct keys has the minimum of MSE which is very close to zero. The MSE values between the input image and its corresponding encrypted image is 6.1073 × 10^{3}whereas the PSNR value is 10.2723. At the same time, the MSE value between the input image and its decrypted image with all correct keys is 4.2097 × 10^{−27} while the PSNR value is 311.8883. These results reveal that the original image is totally encrypted into a noiselike image and which can be reconstructed with all right key.
Further, the MSE curves between the input and their corresponding recovered images are plotted as a function of transform angles of GT1 and GT2 in gamma distribution RPM scheme and uniform RPM scheme, respectively in Figs. 6 and 7. In both the plots, MSE approaches zero when the images are decrypted with correct transform angles, whereas it increases sharply in case of a departure from the correct angles. The MSE curve of the rotation angle is not sensitive to different RPM probability models, which can be seen from the comparison results in Figs. 6 and 7. They are regarded as two sets of relatively independent encryption parameters. The results also show that the GT scheme is very sensitive to the variations in GT angles.
Additionally, we examine the robustness of the proposed algorithm against occlusion and noise attacks. In this test, the gamma distribution parameters are (α, β) = (2, 1) for both of RPMs. And the linear transformation parameters are set to (a, b) = (1, 1) for RPM1 and (a, b) = (2, 0) for RPM2. The encrypted amplitude and phase images are occluded from 20% to 80% sizes which are shown in Fig. 8ah. The occluded pixels are replaced by zero in this test. And corresponding recovered images are displayed in Fig. 8il, respectively. The calculated MSE values between input and its corresponding retrieved images with all the right keys from the encrypted image with 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% occlusions are 1.1310 × 10^{3}, 3.2962 × 10^{3}, 4.5666 × 10^{3} and 7.3289 × 10^{3}, respectively. The calculated PSNR values between input and its corresponding retrieved images with all the right keys from the encrypted image with 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% occlusions are 17.5961, 12.5906, 11.5349 and 9.4804, respectively. In the cases of 20% and 40% occluded encrypted images, their respective decrypted images with all right keys can be recognized obviously. However, the decrypted images with all correct keys from 60% and 80% occluded encrypted images, are not easily recognizable because of data loss. The proposed system shows robustness against occlusion attacks.
At the aspect of robustness analysis, the encrypted image will be checked by noise attack. The additive noise model is expressed as follow,
where E(x, y) and E^{′}(x, y) represent the ciphertexts before and after adding noise. Besides, the parameter p can be regarded as a coefficient representing noise intensity. \( {N}_{\mu, {\sigma}^2}\left(x,y\right) \) denotes Gaussian random data with the mean value μ and variance σ^{2}.
In this test, the encrypted amplitude and phase images are added Gaussian noise with different parameters. All the relevant encryption parameters are the same as in the occlusion test. The results are shown in Fig. 9al. From left to right columns, the noise parameters are (p, μ, σ^{2}) = (0.5, 0, 0.5), (p, μ, σ^{2}) = (1, 0, 0.5), (p, μ, σ^{2}) = (0.5, 0, 2) and (p, μ, σ^{2}) = (1, 0, 2), respectively. The MSE values from left to right each columns are 0.5236 × 10^{3}, 1.8422 × 10^{3}, 4.7273 × 10^{3} and 6.5206 × 10^{3}, respectively. The corresponding PSNR values from left to right columns are 20.9408, 15.4775, 11.3847 and 9.9879. In the first three cases, the original image is retrieved and recognized. The quality of the retrieval image is sensitive to the encrypted phase image. The proposed system has robustness against noise attacks.
Conclusions
We have proposed an encryption scheme for grayscale images with a pair of random phase masks based on gamma distribution in the gyrator domain. The gamma distribution phase mask is preferred over the uniform distribution phase mask in order to introduce parameters that enlarge the key space. In addition to enhancing the system security, the use of gamma distribution RPM also helps in the flexibility of encryption. More importantly, the encrypted image with different parameters of gamma distribution RPMs will have different statistical distribution of phase in the ciphertext. It means that the phase distribution in the ciphertext will not obey the law of random scattering medium. Therefore, it has potential to resist the attack based on the phase retrieval algorithm. The scheme has been validated and its efficacy has been quantitatively evaluated from the computed values of MSE between input and decrypted images. The amplitude and phase pattern distribution of the encrypted image varies with the gamma distribution parameters. We have also examined the scheme’s sensitivity for GT transform orders. Numerical simulations confirm that the scheme is flexible for different gamma distribution parameters. The occlusion and noise attacks analysis establish the scheme’s robustness.
Abbreviations
 CCD:

Charged couple device
 CDF:

Cumulative probability function
 DFT:

Discrete Fourier transform
 DRPE:

Double random phase encoding
 FrFT:

Fractional Fourier transform
 FT:

Fourier transform
 GT:

Gyrator transform
 MSE:

Mean square error
 PDF:

Probability density function
 PSNR:

Peak signaltonoise ratio
 RPK:

Random phase key
 RPM:

Random phase mask
 SLM:

Spatial light modulator
 SPK:

Structured phase key
References
 1.
Alfalou, A., Brosseau, C.: Optical image compression and encryption methods. Adv. Opt. Photon. 1(3), 589–636 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/aop.1.000589
 2.
Millán, M.S.: Advanced optical correlation and digital methods for pattern matching—50th anniversary of Vander Lugt matched filter. J. Opt. 14(10), 103001–103020 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/20408978/14/10/103001
 3.
Chen, W., Javidi, B., Chen, X.: Advances in optical security systems. Adv. Opt. Photon. 6(2), 120–155 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/aop.6.000120
 4.
Liu, S., Guo, C., Sheridan, J.T.: A review of optical image encryption techniques. Opt. Laser Technol. 57, 327–342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.05.023
 5.
Javidi, B., Carnicer, A., Yamaguchi, M., Nomura, T., PérezCabré, E., Millán, M.S., Nishchal, N.K., Torroba, R., Barrera, J.F., He, W., Peng, X., Stern, A., Rivenson, Y., Alfalou, A., Brosseau, C., Guo, C., Sheridan, J.T., Situ, G., Naruse, M., Matsumoto, T., Juvells, I., Tajahuerce, E., Lancis, J., Chen, W., Chen, X., Pinkse, P.W.H., Mosk, A.P., Markman, A.: Roadmap on optical security. J. Opt. 18(8), 083001–083039 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/20408978/18/8/083001
 6.
Vaish, A., Kumar, M.: Color image encryption using singular value decomposition in discrete cosine Stockwell transform domain. Opt. Appl. 48(1), 25–38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5277/oa180103.
 7.
Xu, H., Xu, W., Wang, S., Wu, S.: Phaseonly asymmetric optical cryptosystem based on random modulus decomposition. J. Mod. Opt. 65(10), 1245–1252 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2018.1431314
 8.
Ravi, K., Basanta, B., Naveen, K.N.: Nonlinear QR code based optical image encryption using spiral phase transform, equal modulus decomposition and singular value decomposition. J. Opt. 20(1), 015701–015710 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/20408986/aa9943
 9.
Zhao, H., Zhong, Z., Fang, W., Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Shan, M.: Doubleimage encryption using chaotic maps and nonlinear nonDC joint fractional Fourier transform correlator. Opt. Eng. 55(9), 0931091–0931097 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.55.9.093109.
 10.
Vaish, A., Kumar, M.: Color image encryption using MSVD, DWT and Arnold transform in fractional Fourier domain. Optik. 145, 273–283 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.07.041
 11.
Jaramillo, A., Barrera, J.F., Zea, A.V., Torroba, R.: Fractional optical cryptographic protocol for data containers in a noisefree multiuser environment. Opt. Lasers Eng. 102, 119–125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.10.008
 12.
Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, W., Meng, F., Wu, Q., Liu, S.: Optical color image hiding scheme based on chaotic mapping and Hartley transform. Opt. Lasers Eng. 51(8), 967–972 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.02.015
 13.
Singh, P., Yadav, A.K., Singh, K.: Phase image encryption in the fractional Hartley domain using Arnold transform and singular value decomposition. Opt. Lasers Eng. 91, 187–195 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.11.022
 14.
Wang, J., Song, L., Liang, X., Liu, Y., Liu, P.: Secure and noisefree nonlinear optical cryptosystem based on phasetruncated Fresnel diffraction and QR code. Opt. Quant. Electron. 48(11), (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s1108201607963
 15.
Shen, X., Dou, S., Lei, M., Chen, Y.: Optical image encryption based on a joint Fresnel transform correlator with double optical wedges. Appl. Opt. 55(30), 8513–8522 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.008513
 16.
Zhang, C., He, W., Wu, J., Peng, X.: Optical cryptosystem based on phasetruncated Fresnel diffraction and transport of intensity equation. Opt. Express. 23(7), 8845–8854 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.008845
 17.
Li, X., Meng, X., Yang, X., Wang, Y., Yin, Y., Peng, X., He, W., Dong, G., Chen, H.: Multipleimage encryption via lifting wavelet transform and XOR operation based on compressive ghost imaging scheme. Opt. Lasers Eng. 102, 106–111 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.10.023
 18.
Liu, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Wang, Q.H.: Optical image encryption using chaosbased compressed sensing and phaseshifting interference in fractional wavelet domain. Opt. Rev. 25(1), 46–55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s1004301703903
 19.
Rodrigo, J.A., Alieva, T., Calvo, M.L.: Gyrator transform: properties and applications. Opt. Express. 15(5), 2190–2203 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.15.002190
 20.
Rodrigo, J.A., Alieva, T., Calvo, M.L.: Applications of gyrator transform for image processing. Opt. Commun. 278(2), 279–284 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2007.06.023
 21.
Abuturab, M.R.: Color image security system using double randomstructured phase encoding in gyrator transform domain. Appl. Opt. 51(15), 3006–3016 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.003006
 22.
Abuturab, M.R.: Color information cryptosystem based on optical superposition principle and phasetruncated gyrator transform. Appl. Opt. 51(33), 7994–8002 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.007994
 23.
Abuturab, M.R.: Color information security system using discrete cosine transform in gyrator transform domain radialHilbert phase encoding. Opt. Lasers Eng. 50(9), 1209–1216 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.03.020
 24.
Abuturab, M.R.: Color information security system using Arnold transform and double structured phase encoding in gyrator transform domain. Opt. Laser Technol. 45, 525–532 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.05.037
 25.
Abuturab, M.R.: Color image security system based on discrete Hartley transform in gyrator transform domain. Opt. Lasers Eng. 51(3), 317–324 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.09.008 Abuturab, M.R.: Multiple colorimage authentication system using HSI color space and QR decomposition in gyrator domains. J. Mod. Opt. 63(11), 1035–1050 (2015). doi:10.1080/09500340.2015.1117671
 26.
Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, S., Liu, W., Liu, W., Wang, Y., Liu, S.: Double image encryption scheme by using random phase encoding and pixel exchanging in the gyrator transform domains. Opt. Laser Technol. 47, 152–158 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.09.007
 27.
Liansheng, S., Bei, Z., Xiaojuan, N., Ailing, T.: Optical multipleimage encryption based on the chaotic structured phase masks under the illumination of a vortex beam in the gyrator domain. Opt. Express. 24(1), 499–515 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.000499
 28.
Shao, Z., Shang, Y., Fu, X., Yuan, H., Shu, H.: Doubleimage cryptosystem using chaotic map and mixture amplitudephase retrieval in gyrator domain. Multimed. Tools Appl. 77(1), 1285–1298 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s1104201642790
 29.
Chen, H., Tanougast, C., Liu, Z., Blondel, W., Hao, B.: Optical hyperspectral image encryption based on improved Chirikov mapping and gyrator transform. Opt. Lasers Eng. 107, 62–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.03.011
 30.
Shao, Z., Shang, Y., Tong, Q., Ding, H., Zhao, X., Fu, X.: Multiple color image encryption and authentication based on phase retrieval and partial decryption in quaternion gyrator domain. Multimed. Tools Appl. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s1104201858187
 31.
Yadav, A.K., Vashisth, S., Singh, H., Singh, K.: A phaseimage watermarking scheme in gyrator domain using devil's vortex Fresnel lens as a phase mask. Opt. Commun. 344, 172–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2015.01.019
 32.
Tebaldi, M., Furlan, W.D., Torroba, R., Bolognini, N.: Opticaldata storagereadout technique based on fractal encrypting masks. Opt. Lett. 34(3), 316–318 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.34.000316
 33.
Zamrani, W., Ahouzi, E., Lizana, A., Campos, J., Yzuel, M.J.: Optical image encryption technique based on deterministic phase masks. Opt. Eng. 55(10), 1031081–1031089 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.55.10.103108.
 34.
Barrera, J.F., Henao, R., Torroba, R.: Optical encryption method using toroidal zone plates. Opt. Commun. 248(1–3), 35–40 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2004.11.086
 35.
Barrera, J.F., Henao, R., Torroba, R.: Fault tolerances using toroidal zone plate encryption. Opt. Commun. 256(4–6), 489–494 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2005.06.077
 36.
Rajput, S.K., Nishchal, N.K.: Asymmetric color cryptosystem using polarization selective diffractive optical element and structured phase mask. Appl. Opt. 51(22), 5377–5386 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.005377
 37.
Singh, H., Yadav, A.K., Vashisth, S., Singh, K.: Double phaseimage encryption using gyrator transforms, and structured phase mask in the frequency plane. Opt. Lasers Eng. 67, 145–156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.10.011
 38.
Lin, C., Shen, X.: Design of reconfigurable and structured spiral phase mask for optical security system. Opt. Commun. 370, 127–134 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.03.021
 39.
Lin, C., Shen, X., Lei, M.: Generation of plaintextindependent private key based on conditional decomposition strategy. Opt. Lasers Eng. 86, 303–308 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.06.023
 40.
Singh, H.: Nonlinear optical double image encryption using randomoptical vortex in fractional Hartley transform domain. Opt. Appl. 47(4), 557–578 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5277/oa170406.
 41.
Kumar, R., Bhaduri, B.: Optical image encryption in Fresnel domain using spiral phase transform. J. Opt. 19(9), 095701–095710 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/20408986/aa7cb1
 42.
Abuturab, M.R.: Securing multiple information using chaotic spiral phase encoding with simultaneous interference and superposition methods. Opt. Lasers Eng. 98, 1–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.05.001
 43.
Chen, Q., Shen, X., Dou, S., Lin, C., Wang, L.: Topological charge number multiplexing for JTC multipleimage encryption. Opt. Commun. 412, 155–160 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2017.12.015
 44.
Rafiq Abuturab, M.: Asymmetric multiple information cryptosystem based on chaotic spiral phase mask and random spectrum decomposition. Opt. Laser Technol. 98, 298–308 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.08.010
 45.
Papoulis, A., Pillai, S.U.: Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, 4th edn. McGrawHill, Europe (2002)
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions and questions.
Funding
The work reported in this article is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (11503017); The “Summit of the Six Top Talents” Program of Jiangsu Province (2015DZXX026); Jiangsu Key Disciplines of Thirteenth FiveYear Plan (20168765). The authors are grateful to Suzhou Key Laboratory for Precision and Efficient Processing Technology (SZS201712) for their support.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Wenqing Sun.
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Optical encryption
 Gyrator transform
 Random phase mask
 Gamma distribution