Skip to main content

Optical soliton perturbation of Fokas-Lenells equation by the Laplace-Adomian decomposition algorithm

Abstract

This paper displays numerical simulation for bright and dark optical solitons that emerge from Fokas-Lenells equation which is studied in the context of dispersive solitons in polarization-preserving fibers. The Laplace-Adomian decomposition scheme is the numerical tool adopted in the paper. The numerical results, for bright and dark solitons, are expository and therefore supplement the analytical developments, thus far.

Introduction

One of the governing models to study dispersive solitons is Fokas-Lennels equation (FLE) [113]. In such a model, in addition to group velocity dispersion (GVD), one considers, inter-modal dispersion as well as nonlinear dispersion thus treating it with a flavor of additional dispersive effects. There has been a plethora of analytical tools that have been implemented to study FLE. They range from semi-inverse variational principle, Lie symmetry analysis, Riccati equation approach, exp-function method, traveling wave hypothesis, trial function method and further wide varieties. This paper will be changing gears to study the model from a different perspective. One of the very many and modern numerical algorithms that will be implemented is the Laplace-Adomian decomposition integration scheme. This method has been successfully applied to variety of other models from optics [1416]. This paper now studies FLE, for the first time, by the aid of Laplace-Adomian decomposition scheme. The details are sketched in the remainder of the paper, after introducing the model.

The Fokas-Lenells equation (FLE) in presence of perturbation terms

The dimensionless form of the perturbed Fokas-Lenells equation (FLE) is given by

$$ {\begin{aligned} {iu}_{t}&+a_{1}u_{xx}+a_{2}u_{xt}+\vert u\vert^{2}\left(bu+i\sigma u_{x}\right)\\&\quad=i\left[\alpha u_{x}+\lambda \left(\vert u\vert^{2}u\right)_{x}\ + \mu \left(\vert u\vert^{2}\right)_{x}u\right]. \end{aligned}} $$
(1)

This equation was first studied in [1724] and arises in various systems such as water waves, plasma physics, solid state physics and nonlinear optics. In Eq. (1), u(x,t) represents a complex field envelope, and x and t are spatial and temporal variables, respectively. Here, the coefficient a1 is the group velocity dispersion (GVD) and a2 is the spatio-temporal dispersion (STD) the coefficient b is self-phase modulation moreover σ accounts for nonlinear dispersion. In the perturbative term of Eq. (1), the first term represents the inter-modal dispersion (IMD), the second term is the self-steepening effect and finally the last term accounts for another version of nonlinear dispersion (ND).

Bright optical solitons

The bright optical soliton solution to (1) is given by [5, 11]:

$$ u(x,t)=A\text{sech}\left[(x-\nu t)\right] e^{i[-\kappa x+\omega t+\theta ]}. $$
(2)

Here, ν is the soliton velocity, κ is the soliton frequency, ω is the angular velocity and θ is the phase center.

The amplitude A of the soliton in this case is given by

$$ A=\pm\sqrt{\frac{2(a_{1}-a_{2}\nu)}{b-\kappa\lambda+\kappa\sigma}}, $$
(3)

where, the velocity of the soliton in relation to the coefficients that appear in the Eq. (1) is

$$ \nu=\frac{\alpha+2a_{1}\kappa-a_{2}\omega}{a_{2}\kappa-1}, $$
(4)

and the constraints conditions on the parameters are

$$ a_{2}\kappa\neq 1, \quad 3\lambda+2\mu-\sigma=0. $$
(5)

In the previous context κ is any parameter that satisfies the Eq. (5).

Dark optical solitons

noindent The dark optical soliton solution to (1) is given by [5, 11]:

$$ u(x,t)=B\text{tanh}\left[(x-\nu t)\right] e^{i\left[-\kappa x+\omega t+\theta \right]}. $$
(6)

Here, ν is the soliton velocity, κ is the soliton frequency, ω is the angular velocity and θ is the phase center.

The amplitude B of the soliton in this case is given by

$$ B=\pm\sqrt{\frac{-2(a_{1}-a_{2}\nu)}{b-\kappa\lambda+\kappa\sigma}}, $$
(7)

where, the velocity of the soliton in relation to the coefficients that appear in the Eq. (1) is

$$ \nu=\frac{\alpha+2a_{1}\kappa-a_{2}\omega}{a_{2}\kappa-1}, $$
(8)

and the constraints conditions on the parameters are

$$ a_{2}\kappa\neq 1, \quad 3\lambda+2\mu-\sigma=0. $$
(9)

In the previous context κ is any parameter that satisfies the Eq. (9).

The Laplace Adomian Decomposition Method (LADM)

To illustrate the basic concept of Laplace-Adomian decomposition algorithm, we consider the general form of second order nonlinear partial differential equations in the form

$$ F\left(u(x,t)\right)=0,\quad $$
(10)

with initial conditions

$$ u(x,0)=f(x),\quad u_{x}(x,0)=g(x). $$
(11)

where F is a differential operator. Now, let us decompose this operator as F=L+R+N where \(L(u)=\frac {\partial u}{\partial t}\) stands for a linear differential operator. The operators R and N are the remaining linear and nonlinear parts, respectively.

With these considerations, Eq. (10) can now be rewritten as

$$ L u(x,t)=Ru(x,t)+Nu(x,t). $$
(12)

Solving for Lu(x,t) and applying the Laplace transform respect to t to Eq. (12), gives

$$ \mathcal{L}\left\{L u(x,t)\right\}= \mathcal{L}\left\{Ru(x,t)+Nu(x,t)\right\}. $$
(13)

Thus, Eq. (13) turns out to be equivalent to

$$ su(x,s)-u(x,0)= \mathcal{L}\left\{Ru(x,t)+Nu(x,t)\right\}. $$
(14)

Using Eq. (11), one get

$$ u(x,s)=\frac{f(x)}{s}+\frac{1}{s}\mathcal{L}\left\{Ru(x,t)+Nu(x,t)\right\}. $$
(15)

Finally, by applying inverse Laplace transformation \(\mathcal {L}^{-1}\) on both sides of the Eq. (15), we obtain

$$ u(x,t)=f(x)+\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left[\frac{1}{s}\mathcal{L}\{Ru(x,t)+Nu(x,t)\}\right]. $$
(16)

The Laplace-Adomian decomposition algorithm assumes the solution u(x,t) can be expanded into infinite series given by

$$ u(x,t)= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}u_{n}(x,t). $$
(17)

Moreover, Also the nonlinear operator N is decomposed as

$$ Nu(x,t)= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}A_{n}(u_{0},u_{1},\ldots, u_{n}),. $$
(18)

Each An is an Adomian polynomial of u0,u1,…,un that can be calculated for all forms of nonlinearity according to the following formula [2527]:

$$A_{0}=N(u_{0}), $$
$$ A_{n}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{m}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(k+1)u_{i,k+1}\frac{\partial}{\partial u_{i,0}}A_{n-1-k},\quad n\geq 1. $$
(19)

Therefore Adomian’s polynomials are given by A0=N(u0)

A1=u1N(u0)

\(A_{2}=u_{2}N'(u_{0})+\frac {1}{2}u_{1}^{2}N''(u_{0})\)

\(A_{3}=u_{3}N'(u_{0})+u_{1}u_{2}N''(u_{0})+\frac {1}{3!}u_{1}^{3}N^{(3)}(u_{0})\)

\(A_{4}=u_{4}N'(u_{0})+\left (\frac {1}{2}u_{2}^{2}+u_{1}u_{3}\right)N''(u_{0})+\frac {1}{2!}u_{1}^{2}u_{2}N^{(3)}(u_{0})+\frac {1}{4!}u_{1}^{4}N^{(4)}(u_{0})\)

All other polynomials are calculated in a similar way.

Substituting (17) and (18) into Eq. (16) gives rise to

$$ \begin{aligned} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}u_{n}(x,t)=& f(x)+\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left[\frac{1}{s}\mathcal{L}\left\{R\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}u_{n}(x,t)\right.\right.\\ &\left.\left. +\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}A_{n}(u_{0},u_{1},\ldots, u_{n})\right\}\right]. \end{aligned} $$
(20)

Hence, Eq. (20) suggests the following iterative algorithm

$$ {\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} u_{0}(x,t)=f(x),\\ u_{n+1}(x,t)=\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left[\frac{1}{s}\mathcal{L}\left\{{Ru}_{n}(x,t)+A_{n}(u_{0},u_{1},\ldots, u_{n})\right\}\right],\;\; n=0,1,2,\ldots \end{array}\right. \end{aligned}} $$
(21)

Finally, after determining un’s, the N-term truncated approximation of the solution is obtained as

$$ u_{N}(x,t)=\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}u_{n}(x,t),\;\; N\geq 1. $$
(22)

From this analysis it is evident that, the Adomian decomposition method, combined with the Laplace transform requires less effort in comparison with the traditional Adomian decomposition method. This method considerably decreases the number of calculations. In addition, Adomian decomposition procedure is easily established without requiring to linearize the problem.

Solution of the perturbed Fokas-Lenells equation by LADM

In this section, we outline the application of LADM to obtain explicit solution of Eq. (1) with the initial conditions u(x,0)=f(x), ux(x,0)=g(x).

Let us consider the dimensionless form of the perturbed Fokas-Lenells equation Eq. (1) in an operator form

$$ Lu(x,t)+Ru(x,t)+N_{1}u(x,t)+N_{2}u(x,t)+N_{3}u(x,t)=0 $$
(23)

where the notation N1u=−i|u|2(bu+iσux), N2u=−λ(|u|2u)x and N3u=−μu(|u|2)x symbolize the nonlinear term, respectively. The notation Ru=−(αux+ia1uxx+ia2uxt) symbolize the linear differential operator and Lu=ut simply means derivative with respect to time.

The LADM represents solution as an infinite series of components given below,

$$ u(x,t)= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}u_{n}(x,t). $$
(24)

The nonlinear terms N1u, N2u and N3u can be decomposed into infinite series of Adomian polynomials given by:

$$ N_{1}u=-i\vert u\vert^{2}(bu+i\sigma u_{x})=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}P_{n}(u_{0},u_{1},\ldots, u_{n}), $$
(25)
$$ N_{2}u=-\lambda\left(\vert u\vert^{2}u\right)_{x}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}Q_{n}(u_{0},u_{1},\ldots, u_{n}), $$
(26)

and

$$ N_{3}u=-\mu u\left(\vert u\vert^{2}\right)_{x}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}R_{n}(u_{0},u_{1},\ldots, u_{n}). $$
(27)

Here Pn, Qn and Rn are the Adomian polynomials and can be calculated by the formula given by the Eq. (19), that is,

$$P_{0}=N_{1}(u_{0}),\quad Q_{0}=N_{2}(u_{0}),\quad R_{0}=N_{3}(u_{0}), $$

and for every n≥1 we have

$$ P_{n}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{m}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(k+1)u_{i,k+1}\frac{\partial}{\partial u_{i,0}}P_{n-1-k}, $$
(28)
$$ Q_{n}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{m}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(k+1)u_{i,k+1}\frac{\partial}{\partial u_{i,0}}Q_{n-1-k}, $$
(29)
$$ R_{n}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{m}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(k+1)u_{i,k+1}\frac{\partial}{\partial u_{i,0}}R_{n-1-k}. $$
(30)

The first few Adomian polynomials are given by

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} P_{0}&=-{ibu}_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{0},\\ P_{1}&=-2{ibu}_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{0}-{ibu}_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{1},\\ P_{2}&=-2{ibu}_{0}u_{2}\bar{u}_{0}-{ibu}_{1}^{2}\bar{u}_{0}-2{ibu}_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{1}-{ibu}_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{2},\\ P_{3}&=-2{ibu}_{0}u_{3}\bar{u}_{0}-2{ibu}_{1}u_{2}\bar{u}_{0}-2{ibu}_{0}u_{2}\bar{u}_{1}-{ibu}_{1}^{2}\bar{u}_{1}\\&\quad-2{ibu}_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{2}-{ibu}_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{3},\\ P_{4}&=-ib\bar{u}_{0}u_{2}^{2}-2{ibu}_{0}\bar{u}_{0}u_{4}-2ib\bar{u}_{0}u_{1}u_{3}-2{ibu}_{0}\bar{u}_{1}u_{3}\\&\quad-2{ibu}_{1}\bar{u}_{1}u_{2}+2u_{0}\bar{u}_{2}u_{2}-{ibu}_{1}^{2}\bar{u}_{2} \\& -2{ibu}_{0}\bar{u}_{1}u_{3}-{ibu}_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{4},\\ \vdots \end{array} $$
$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} Q_{0}&=-(\lambda+\mu)u_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{0x},\\[-2pt] Q_{1}&= -(\lambda+\mu)\left(u_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{1x}+2u_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{0x}\right),\\[-2pt] Q_{2}&=\!-(\lambda\,+\,\mu)\left(u_{1}^{2}\bar{u}_{0x}\,+\,u_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{2x}\,+\,2u_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{1x}\,+\,2u_{0}u_{2}\bar{u}_{0x}\right), \\ Q_{3}&=-(\lambda+\mu)\left(u_{1}^{2}\bar{u}_{1x}+u_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{3x}+2u_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{2x}\right.\\[-2pt] &\quad \left. +2u_{0}u_{2}\bar{u}_{1x}+2u_{0}u_{3}\bar{u}_{0x}+2u_{1}u_{2}\bar{u}_{0x}\right),\\ Q_{4}&=-(\lambda+\mu)\left(u_{2}^{2}\bar{u}_{0x}\,+\,u_{1}^{2}\bar{u}_{2x}\,+\,2u_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{3x}+2u_{0}u_{2}\bar{u}_{2x}\right.\\& \left.+2u_{0}u_{3}\bar{u}_{1x}+2u_{0}u_{4}\bar{u}_{0x}+2u_{1}u_{2}\bar{u}_{1x} +2u_{1}u_{3}\bar{u}_{0x}\right),\\ \vdots \end{array} $$
$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} R_{0}&=(\sigma-2\lambda-\mu)u_{0}\bar{u}_{0}u_{0x},\\[-2pt] R_{1}&= (\sigma-2\lambda-\mu)(u_{0}\bar{u}_{0}u_{1x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{1}u_{0x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{0}u_{0x}),\\[-2pt] R_{2}&=(\sigma-2\lambda-\mu)\left(u_{0}\bar{u}_{0}u_{2x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{1}u_{1x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{2}u_{0x}\right.\\[-2pt] &\left.+u_{1}\bar{u}_{0}u_{1x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{1}u_{0x}+u_{2}\bar{u}_{0}u_{0x}\right),\\[-2pt] R_{3}&=(\sigma-2\lambda-\mu)\left(u_{0}\bar{u}_{0}u_{3x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{1}u_{2x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{2}u_{1x}\right.\\[-2pt] & +u_{0}\bar{u}_{3}u_{0x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{0}u_{2x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{1}u_{1x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{2}u_{0x}\\[-2pt] &\left.+u_{2}\bar{u}_{0}u_{1x}+u_{2}\bar{u}_{1}u_{0x}+u_{3}\bar{u}_{0}u_{0x}\right),\\[-2pt] R_{4}&=(\sigma-2\lambda-\mu)\left(u_{0}\bar{u}_{0}u_{4x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{1}u_{3x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{2}u_{2x}\right.\\[-2pt] &+u_{0}\bar{u}_{3}u_{1x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{4}u_{0x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{0}u_{3x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{1}u_{2x}\\[-2pt] &+u_{1}\bar{u}_{2}u_{1x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{3}u_{0x}+u_{2}\bar{u}_{0}u_{2x}+u_{2}\bar{u}_{1}u_{1x}\\[-2pt] &\left.+u_{2}\bar{u}_{2}u_{0x}+u_{3}\bar{u}_{0}u_{1x}+u_{3}\bar{u}_{1}u_{0x}+u_{4}\bar{u}_{0}u_{0x}\right),\\ \vdots \end{array} $$

Then, the Adomian polynomials corresponding to the nonlinear part Nu=N1u+N2u+N3u are

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} {} A_{0}&=-{ibu}_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{0}-(\lambda+\mu)u_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{0x}+(\sigma-2\lambda-\mu)u_{0}\bar{u}_{0}u_{0x},\\[-2pt] {} A_{1}&=-2{ibu}_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{0}\,-\,{ibu}_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{1}-\!(\lambda+\mu)(u_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{1x}+2u_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{0x})\\[-2pt] &\quad+(\sigma-2\lambda-\mu)(u_{0}\bar{u}_{0}u_{1x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{1}u_{0x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{0}u_{0x}),\\ {} A_{2}&=-2{ibu}_{0}u_{2}\bar{u}_{0}-{ibu}_{1}^{2}\bar{u}_{0}-2{ibu}_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{1}-{ibu}_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{2}\\[-4pt]&\quad-(\lambda+\mu)\left(u_{1}^{2}\bar{u}_{0x}+u_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{2x}+2u_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{1x}+2u_{0}u_{2}\bar{u}_{0x}\right)\\&\quad+(\sigma-2\lambda-\mu)(u_{0}\bar{u}_{0}u_{2x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{1}u_{1x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{2}u_{0x}\\ \end{array} $$
$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} &\quad+u_{1}\bar{u}_{0}u_{1x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{1}u_{0x}+u_{2}\bar{u}_{0}u_{0x}),\\ {} A_{3}&=-2{ibu}_{0}u_{3}\bar{u}_{0}-2{ibu}_{1}u_{2}\bar{u}_{0}-2{ibu}_{0}u_{2}\bar{u}_{1}-{ibu}_{1}^{2}\bar{u}_{1}\\ &\quad-2{ibu}_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{2}-{ibu}_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{3}-(\lambda+\mu)(u_{1}^{2}\bar{u}_{1x}+u_{0}^{2}\bar{u}_{3x}\\&\quad+2u_{0}u_{1}\bar{u}_{2x}+2u_{0}u_{2}\bar{u}_{1x}+2u_{0}u_{3}\bar{u}_{0x}+2u_{1}u_{2}\bar{u}_{0x})\\&\quad+(\sigma-2\lambda-\mu)\times (u_{0}\bar{u}_{0}u_{3x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{1}u_{2x}+u_{0}\bar{u}_{2}u_{1x}\\&\quad+u_{0}\bar{u}_{3}u_{0x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{0}u_{2x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{1}u_{1x}+u_{1}\bar{u}_{2}u_{0x}\\&\quad+u_{2}\bar{u}_{0}u_{1x}+u_{2}\bar{u}_{1}u_{0x}+u_{3}\bar{u}_{0}u_{0x}),\\ \end{array} $$

and so on for other Adomian polynomials.

By applying the Laplace transform with respect to t on both sides of the Eq. (23) and using the linearity of the Laplace transform gives:

$$ {\begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}\left\{Lu(x,t)\right\}&= -\mathcal{L}\{Ru(x,t)\}-\mathcal{L}\left\{N_{1} u(x,t)\right\}\\&\quad-\mathcal{L}\left\{N_{2} u(x,t)\right\}-\mathcal{L}\left\{N_{3} u(x,t)\right\}. \end{aligned}} $$
(31)

Because of the differentiation property of Laplace transform, Eq. (31) can be written as

$$ {\begin{aligned} s\mathcal{L}\{u(x,t)\}&-u(x,0)= -\mathcal{L}\left\{Ru(x,t)\right\}-\mathcal{L}\left\{N_{1} u(x,t)\right\}\\&\quad-\mathcal{L}\left\{N_{2} u(x,t)\right\}-\mathcal{L}\left\{N_{3} u(x,t)\right\}. \end{aligned}} $$
(32)

Thus,

$$ {{} \begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}\left\{u(x,t)\right\}&=\frac{1}{s}u(x,0)-\frac{1}{s}\left(\mathcal{L}\left\{Ru(x,t)\right\}+\mathcal{L}\left\{N_{1} u(x,t)\right\}\right.\\ &\left.+\mathcal{L}\left\{N_{2} u(x,t)\right\}+\mathcal{L}\left\{N_{3} u(x,t)\right\}\right). \end{aligned}} $$
(33)

By substituting (24), (25), (26) and (27) into (33), we obtain

$$ \begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}\left\{\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}u_{n}(x,t)\right\}=&\frac{f(x)}{s}-\frac{1}{s}\left(\mathcal{L}\left\{R\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}u_{n}(x,t)\right\}\right.\\ &\left.+\!\mathcal{L}\left\{\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}P_{n}\right\}\,+\,\mathcal{L}\left\{\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}Q_{n}\right\}\,+\,\mathcal{L}\left\{\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}R_{n}\right\}\right). \end{aligned} $$
(34)

Comparing both sides of the Eq. (34), the following relations arise:

$$ \mathcal{L}\left\{u_{0}(x,t)\right\}=\frac{f(x)}{s} $$
(35)
$$ {\begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}\left\{u_{1}(x,t)\right\}=-\frac{1}{s}\left(\mathcal{L}\left\{{Ru}_{0}(x,t)\right\}+\mathcal{L}\left\{P_{0}\right\}+\mathcal{L}\left\{Q_{0}\right\}+\mathcal{L}\left\{R_{0}\right\}\right) \end{aligned}} $$
(36)
$$ {\begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}\left\{u_{2}(x,t)\right\}\,=\,-\frac{1}{s} \left(\mathcal{L}\left\{{Ru}_{1}(x,t)\right\}\,+\,\mathcal{L}\left\{P_{1}\right\}\,+\,\mathcal{L}\left\{Q_{1}\right\}\,+\,\mathcal{L}\left\{R_{1}\right\}\right). \end{aligned}} $$
(37)

In general, we get the following recursive algorithm

$$ {\begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}\left\{u_{n+1}(x,t)\right\}&=-\frac{1}{s}\left(\mathcal{L}\left\{{Ru}_{n}(x,t)\right\}+\mathcal{L}\left\{P_{n}\right\}\right.\\&\left.+\mathcal{L}\left\{Q_{n}\right\}+\mathcal{L}\left\{R_{n}\right\}\right), \quad n\geq 1. \end{aligned}} $$
(38)

Finally, by applying inverse Laplace transformation we deduce the following recurrence formulas for each n=0,1,2,…,

$$ {{} \begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} u_{0}(x,t)=f(x),\\ u_{n+1}(x,t)=&\!\!\!\!\!\!-\mathcal{L}^{-1}\left[\frac{1}{s}\mathcal{L}\{{Ru}_{n}(x,t)+P_{n}(u_{0},\ldots, u_{n})\right.\\ &\left.+Q_{n}(u_{0},\ldots, u_{n})+R_{n}(u_{0},\ldots, u_{n})\}{\vphantom{\frac{1}{s}}}\right]. \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}} $$
(39)

Numerical simulations and graphical results

We perform numerical simulations for bright and dark optical solitions.

Application to bright optical solitions

The result and the profile of four cases are shown in Table 1 and in Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Dynamic evolution profile of |u|2 via LADM (left) and contour plot of the wave amplitude of |u|2 (right) for the values of the parameters used in case 1 with |Max Error|=2.1×10−10

Fig. 2
figure 2

Dynamic evolution profile of |u|2 via LADM (left) and contour plot of the wave amplitude of |u|2 (right) for the values of the parameters used in case 2 with |Max Error|=3.0×10−10

Fig. 3
figure 3

Dynamic evolution profile of |u|2 via LADM (left) and contour plot of the wave amplitude of |u|2 (right) for the values of the parameters used in case 3 with |Max Error|=1.5×10−10

Fig. 4
figure 4

Dynamic evolution profile of |u|2 via LADM (left) and contour plot of the wave amplitude of |u|2 (right) for the values of the parameters used in case 4 with |Max Error|=1.0×10−10

Table 1 Bright optical solitons

Application to dark optical solitions

The result and the profile of four cases are shown in Table 2 and in Figs. 5, 6, 7 and 8.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Dynamic evolution profile of |u|2 via LADM (left) and contour plot of the wave amplitude of |u|2 (right) for the values of the parameters used in case 5 with |Max Error|=2.5×10−10

Fig. 6
figure 6

Dynamic evolution profile of |u|2 via LADM (left) and contour plot of the wave amplitude of |u|2 (right) for the values of the parameters used in case 6 with |Max Error|=2.5×10−10

Fig. 7
figure 7

Dynamic evolution profile of |u|2 via LADM (left) and contour plot of the wave amplitude of |u|2 (right) for the values of the parameters used in case 7 with |Max Error|=1.0×10−10

Fig. 8
figure 8

Dynamic evolution profile of |u|2 via LADM (left) and contour plot of the wave amplitude of |u|2 (right) for the values of the parameters used in case 8 with |Max Error|=1.5×10−10

Table 2 Dark optical solitons

Conclusions

This paper successfully studied FLE in polarization-preserving fibers by the aid of Laplace-Adomian decomposition scheme. The numerical scheme yielded bright and dark soliton solutions. The results thus appear with a complete spectrum of soliton solutions. Although singular solitons is a third form of solitons that emerge from this model, it does not provide any interest with any kind of numerical scheme. The results of the paper are truly encouraging to study the methodology further along. Later, this scheme will be applied to vector coupled FLE that studies solitons in birefringent fibers. Further along the model will be extended to address WDM/DWDM/UDWDM topology numerically. Such studies are currently under way.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

DWDM:

Dense wavelength division multiplexing

FLE:

Fokas-lennels equation

GVD:

Group velocity dispersion

IMD:

Inter-modal dispersion

LADM:

Laplace-adomian decomposition method

ND:

Nonlinear dispersion

STD:

Spatio-temporal dispersion

UDWDM:

Ultra-dense wavelength division multiplexing

WDM:

Wavelength-division multiplexing

References

  1. Biswas, A., Ekici, M., Sonmezoglu, A., Alqahtani, R. T.: Optical soliton perturbation with full nonlinearity for Fokas-Lenells equation. Optik. 165, 29–34 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biswas, A., Yildirim, Y., Yasar, E., Zhou, Q., Mahmood, M. F., Moshokoa, S. P., Belic, M.: Optical solitons with differential group delay for coupled Fokas-Lenells equation using two integration schemes. Optik. 165, 74–86 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biswas, A., Ekici, M., Sonmezoglu, A., Alqahtani, R. T.: Optical solitons with differential group delay for coupled Fokas–Lenells equation by extended trial function scheme. Optik. 165, 102–110 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jawad Mohamad, A. J., Biswas, A., Zhou, Q., Moshokoa, S. P., Belic M.: Optical soliton perturbation of Fokas-Lenells equation with two integration schemes. Optik. 165, 111–116 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biswas, A., Rezazadeh, H., Mirzazadeh, M., Eslami, M., Ekici, M., Zhou, Q., Moshokoa, S. P., Belic, M.: Optical soliton perturbation with Fokas-Lenells equation using three exotic and efficient integration schemes. Optik. 165, 288–294 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Biswas, A.: Chirp-free bright optical soliton perturbation with Fokas-Lenells equation by traveling wave hypothesis and semi-inverse variational principle. Optik. 170, 431–435 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aljohani, A. F., Ebaid, A., El-Zahar, E. R., Ekici, M., Biswas, A.: Optical soliton perturbation with Fokas-Lenells model by Riccati equation approach. Optik. 172, 741–745 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Biswas, A., Yıldırım, Y., Yaşar, E., Zhou, Q., Moshokoa, S. P., Belic, M.: Optical soliton solutions to Fokas-Lenells equation using some different methods. Optik. 173, 21–31 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arshed, S., Biswas, A., Zhou, Q., Moshokoa, S. P., Belic, M.: Optical solitons with polarization-mode dispersion for coupled Fokas-Lenells equation with two forms of integration architecture. Opt. Quant. Electron. 50, 304 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bansal, A., Kara, A. H., Biswas, A., Moshokoa, S. P., Belic, M.: Optical soliton perturbation, group invariants and conservation laws of perturbed Fokas-Lenells equation. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 114, 275–280 (2018).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnan, E. V., Biswas, A., Zhou, Q., Alfiras, M.: Optical soliton perturbation with Fokas-Lenells equation by mapping methods. Optik. 178, 104–110 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arshed, S., Biswas, A., Zhou, Q., Khan, S., Adesanya, S., Moshokoa, S. P., Belic, M.: Optical solitons pertutabation with Fokas-Lenells equation by e x p(−ϕ(ξ))-expansion method. Optik. 179, 341–345 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bansal, A., Kara, A. H., Biswas, A., Khan, S., Zhou, Q., Moshokoa, S. P.: Optical solitons and conservation laws with polarization-mode dispersion for coupled Fokas-Lenells equation using group invariance. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 120, 245–249 (2019).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. González-Gaxiola, O., Biswas, A.: W-shaped optical solitons of Chen-Lee-Liu equation by Laplace-Adomian decomposition method. Opt. Quant. Electron. 50, 314 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. González-Gaxiola, O., Biswas, A.: Akhmediev breathers, Peregrine solitons and Kuznetsov-Ma solitons in optical fibers and PCF by Laplace-Adomian decomposition method. Optik. 172, 930–939 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. González-Gaxiola, O., Biswas, A.: Optical solitons with Radhakrishnan-Kundu-Lakshmanan equation by Laplace-Adomian decomposition method. Optik. 179, 434–442 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fokas, A. S.: On a class of physically important integrable equations. Physica. D. 87, 145–150 (1995).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lenells, J.: Exactly solvable model for nonlinear pulse propagation in optical fibers. Stud. Appl. Math. 123, 215–232 (2009).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lenells, J., Fokas, A. S.: On a novel integrable generalization of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Nonlinearity. 22, 11–27 (2009).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, C., Liu, W., Zhou, Q., Mihalache, D., Malomed, B. A.: One-soliton shaping and two-soliton interaction in the fifth-order variable-coefficient nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Nonlinear Dyn. 95, 369–380 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Triki, H., Zhou, Q., Liu, W.: W-shaped solitons in inhomogeneous cigar-shaped Bose-Einstein condensates with repulsive interatomic interactions. Laser Phys. 29, 055401 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, C., Wazwaz, A. M., Zhou, Q., Liu, W.: Transformation of soliton states for a (2+1) dimensional fourth-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation in the Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain. Laser Phys. 29, 035401 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aouadi, S., Bouzida, A., Daoui, A. K., Triki, H., Zhou, Q., Sha, Liu.: W-shaped, bright and dark solitons of Biswas-Arshed equation. Optik. 182, 227–232 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, Y., Yang, C., Yu, W., Mirzazadeh, M., Zhou, Q., Liu, W.: Interactions of vector anti-dark solitons for the coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equation in inhomogeneous fibers. Nonlinear Dyn. 94, 1351–1360 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wazwaz, A. M.: A new algorithm for calculating Adomian polynomials for nonlinear operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 111(1), 33–51 (2000).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Duan, J. S.: Convenient analytic recurrence algorithms for the Adomian polynomials. Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 6337–6348 (2011).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Duan, J. S.: New recurrence algorithms for the nonclassic Adomian polynomials. Appl. Math. Comput. 62, 2961–2977 (2011).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

The research work of the third author (MRB) was supported by the grant NPRP 8-028-1-001 from QNRF and he is thankful for it.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The original ideas and results emerged from discussions among all the authors. OGG wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. González-Gaxiola.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González-Gaxiola, O., Biswas, A. & Belic, M.R. Optical soliton perturbation of Fokas-Lenells equation by the Laplace-Adomian decomposition algorithm. J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ. 15, 13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-019-0111-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-019-0111-6

Keywords

  • Fokas-lenells equation
  • Polarization-preserving fibers
  • Adomian decomposition method
  • Optical solitons solutions
  • Perturbation